Entries for Oct, 2009

Budgets and Building Websites

Budgets and Building Websites

by Andrew Grinaker
VP, Business Development & Strategy

Interactive Agencies get the question all the time. How much does a website cost?

And they ask the same question, in one form or another. How much budget do you have allocated for your website project?
Both answers are rarely answered with a direct, concise statement.

When the agency is asked how much a website cost, suddenly 10-15 questions run through their heads that they must prepare and ask the client in order to provide a well thought out estimated cost. A good agency must understand their client's marketing goals, their available technical and creative resources in-house, their current hosting environment and several other factors that determine the right solution for a particular client.

On the flip side, when the agency asks the client how much budget is allocated, (3) different responses are likely to occur. (a) We are not sure how much something like this cost, (b) We would rather not disclose that at this time to seek out the most competitive bids and (c) As stated in the RFP distributed, we have X amount of budget available for this project, Q2, fiscal year, etc.

While it is completely understandable to not disclose the budget available, a cost range is extremely beneficial to the Client/Agency selection process.

For starters, if an agency has access to a budget range; let's say $75,000-$150,000 or $10,000-$20,000, they can provide a proposal that provides a solution that can stay within that budget. If you have requested proposals from 6 firms, you will then receive (6) bids that will fall within your desired range but still give enough room for dissemination between the firms that have competitive bids and the ones that are the most comprehensive in their technical and creative responses.

Some will argue that disclosing budget could potentially reduce the quality of the project. However, a good agency will be clear in what they intend on delivering for the budget that is available.

Example: For X budget, we can deliver a website that includes (3) concepts, 30 pages of content, built in a PHP framework and content management system that will allow you to manager X, Y and Z areas of your website. These items should be line item for the client to understand where budget implications are most impacted.
It is food for thought when contacting an agency to begin the selection process.

Note: It is completely feasible to not have an idea of a cost range for a particular project that has unique technical, creative or marketing deliverables. This becomes the job of the agency to help educate the client and walk through the budgeting process to understand the impact financially and from a timeline standpoint.

Continue Reading

Net Neutrality - Part Deux (Updated)

by Dan Korvas

It appears our government is actually keeping good on their word to maintain net neutrality. This week, the FCC took initial measures that will support the open Internet rule and I could not be happier about this movement. As I have wrote about in the past with AT&T vs 4chan.org, net neutrality is something that I fully support and I wish that more people cared about what the impact would be should the ISPs have control of what (legal)content flows through their pipes.

On Thursday, the FCC Commission voted 5-0 to proceed with establishing a rule to allow the open Internet, and then voted 3-2 to approve the current language of the rules. The latter vote may seem confusing, but we have to remember that this is the Government we are dealing with. We will see more partisanship in the future regarding this final FCC rule, but the fact that the FCC is greeting the idea of net neutrality with open arms is reassuring to those of us who are pro-net neutrality. Now that this vote has taken place, the FCC will be taking public comments on January 14 regarding the issue, which they will review and ask for additional comments that are due by March 5, 2010.

So what this means is we should expect to hear plenty from the ISP powerhouses like AT&T and Comcast who do not want this rule to pass, and on the other end we will have supporters such as Google who want to maintain the open system of the Internet as it was originally intended.

UPDATE:

It appears that the debate on net neutrality has gained strength in the past 24 hours, with large media outles such as Reuters and the WSJ putting out articles regarding what both sides are saying about the issue. When our current president was running his campaign, he insisted that net neutrality was a big issue and he was a big supporter of maintaining an open stance on internet usage. Let us hope that he keeps his position.

Here are some new articles pointing out support for and against net neutrality:

Wall Street Journal
San Francisco Chronicle - In a surprise move, Google and Verizon issue a joint statement
Washington Post
Reuters - This is an article regarding John McCain and his support against net neutrality, and he has created a bill that is in the senate which is dubbed "The Internet Freedom Act." Really? Internet Freedom Act? I do not understand how it would be considered 'freedom' if it means that it gives ISPs the authority to control intnernet usage. However, it now makes sense as to why he put forth this bill..."Senator John McCain (R-AZ) is the top recipient of campaigncontributions from large Internet service providers like AT&T,Verizon and Comcast over the past two years."

Well, how do you like that...A bill created by a man that has claimed on record that he doesn't even know how to use a computer is trying to pass a law that will have an unprecedented effect on how the nation will be able to use this amazing medium.

UPDATED 10.24.2009

Continue Reading

Industry News - Windows 7, Twitter and More

Industry News - Windows 7, Twitter and More
by Andrew Grinaker

Sorry for the week long delay, we had a large launch of a website and been busy with projects internally. As you know, billable clients come first before our own stuff.

Here is some good industry news to follow.

Windows 7 - The Best and Worst Features of the New Microsoft Operating System - TechFlash.com

iPhone vs. PC - Ballmer States "the Internet is not designed for the iPhone - Associated Press (near bottom of article)

Twitter - Bing to Integrate Twitter, Facebook Posts - New York Times (Google quickly followed with similar announcement)

Screenlife Games - Makers of SceneIt? Move into Digital World - TechFlash.com (A plug for one of our favorite clients)

Continue Reading

FGI Welcomes New CMS Partner

FGI Welcomes New CMS Partner
by Loren Skaggs, CEO

FGI is a "platform agnostic" development firm. This means that we can, and do, build websites on virtually any platform -- .Net, PHP, ColdFusion, etc. We are also CMS agnostic; we work with everything from Microsoft SharePoint to Joomla!, Drupal, DotNetNuke, and more, including our own custom CMS for clients with highly specialized needs.

So, I'm very happy to welcome a new CMS partner into the FGI fold: we are now working with Sitecore, an excellent commercial ASP .Net CMS. I have been working with CMS products for as long as there have been commercial CMS products, and Sitecore is simply fantastic. It has a combination of ease-of-use and robustness of function that I have found difficult to match in many other products.

You can learn more about Sitecore by visiting their website at http://www.sitecore.net, or you can just give us a call here at FGI.com, and we'll tell you what we think of it.

We will always offer our clients the best solutions based upon their current situations, so if Sitecore (or any other CMS) isn't the right fit for you, we will find you something that is. But I am very excited about Sitecore, and look forward to working with them down the road.

Thanks,

Loren

Continue Reading

"Simplify, Simplify" - The Complex Needn't Be Complicated

At least not with websites.

Dave Riensche, Art Director

It's not often that someone wishes for complication in their life. To do so might warrant an A&E series where documentary-style cameras and TV-ready psychologists intervene in a manner that exposes real-life protagonists down to their core, resulting in a break-down, then recovery back to normality and wishes for simplicity.

Thoreau said "simplify, simplify." While not many would disagree, it is often thought that simplicity must be sacrificed in the name of complexity. The thought is that if the content of a product, website, whatever, is very complex, surely one must study it to understand it. A complex website cannot be made simple. To do so would be to remove important facets. With so many facets, each a component of a magnificent jewel, simplifying would lead to reduction in quality. To put it simply (that is the theme after all), simplifying the complex is thought to destroy the value.

This isn't entirely inaccurate. Understanding something very complex DOES take time. The mistake is made when the creator of a website assumes that visitors must understand every facet.

Digress with me for a moment.

Picture a Powerpoint presentation. In a black and white world, there are two types. There's the "put it all on one page" method. This is clearly identified by the usage of 50 bullet points on the first slide. The presentation tends to go faster, and the viewers tend to retain little. The other type is the "one slide at a time" method. This is clearly identified by the length of the presentation, which rarely finishes within the allotted time-slot. Viewers tend to retain the first few slides, but not anything after that, as they most likely drift off to a place that isn't dull as all heck within the first 10 minutes.

Powerpoint presentations are difficult, to say the least. Thankfully, we're talking about websites.

When planning a website, the considerations are different. Rather than taking everything the website owner knows about a subject, then cramming it down a visitor's throat, we have the opportunity to offer choice. With choice comes flexibility.

In our first Powerpoint example, all information was dumped on one page. We see websites like this all the time. It's all important, right? You don't want anyone to miss anything. The problem with this method is that instead of visitors getting everything the owner thinks is important, they receive almost nothing. It's called information overload. It's called a needle in a haystack. How can I find what I'm looking for if I have to spend 20 minutes looking for it? Our society doesn't work this way.

Likewise, information cannot be reduced down to one idea. To simply present the needle will most likely turn off all the visitors looking for a specific type of hay.

The solution is to analyze user needs and content. Then organize and segment. Create a hierarchy of information chunks, and a clear pathway between them. Present higher level avenues to your visitors at the opening of the website (homepage) which they can travel down to reach what they are looking for. Shoot for three or four main highways. But always give your visitors the opportunity to warp to another logically related location that isn't on the main path. Users choose the information they want, which means they are more likely to retain it, and return when they want more.

Thoreau also said "our life is frittered away by detail," which is hard to swallow for a designer who believes that quality is in the details. But websites weren't a very big industry in Thoreau's time.

Continue Reading

My Favorite Sites for Industry News

My Favorite Places to Get Industry News

by Andrew Grinaker
VP, Business Development/Strategy

Every six months or so, I like to refresh my resources of websites that I am accessing information from. Some of these sites stay the same and stand the test of time (see SeoMoz.org) and others are new entries into the must-read websites (see HubSpot.com).

I thought I would post a blog outlining these resources to give everyone out there some places to review information and stay up to date on the industry.

www.SeoMoz.com
Seattle based company has been providing marketers with search engine education, tools and resources for several years. Not only does Rand Fishkin and his team keep the free blog up to date with tons of relevant articles and whiteboard material, the cost effective membership options provide all the tools a search engine expert would come to expect.

www.HubSpot.com
A relatively new website that has been added to my daily sites to review, I have found this site to be loaded with articles, webinars and eBooks covering all aspects of online marketing and analytics. The site breaks down SEO, blogging, Social Media into laymen's terms and also provides advanced advice on increasing your website conversion rates on lead tracking, lead management and site analysis.

www.TechFlash.com
Founded by former Tech writers for the Seattle Time and Seattle P.I., TechFlash.com is a perfect place to stay up to date on the local tech companies in Seattle and also technology news across the globe. Multiple bloggers on the site help provide constant updates and blogs devoted directly to Microsoft and Amazon.

www.SeoChat.com
A long standing website to view daily in my world, SEOChat's utilizes the open source search community better than anyone out there. Their articles/topics are constantly managed, updated and commented on, providing a sense of trust and security on important SEO and SEM issues.

If you have any websites you would like to share, please provide them in the comment section of the blog or contact me at twitter.com/agrinaker.

Continue Reading